A4-7300 vs Pentium G3220

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium G3220
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 54 Watt
1.17
+21.9%
A4-7300
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.96

Pentium G3220 outperforms A4-7300 by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium G3220 and A4-7300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23842523
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.13no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.061.41
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)August 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$71no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium G3220 and A4-7300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz4 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1024 KB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size177 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data70 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C70 °C
Number of transistors1,400 million1,303 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G3220 and A4-7300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket1150FM2
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G3220 and A4-7300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G3220 and A4-7300 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G3220 and A4-7300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1600
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD (Haswell)AMD Radeon HD 8470D
จำนวนพาธไลน์no data192
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G3220 and A4-7300 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium G3220 and A4-7300 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 11

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G3220 and A4-7300.

PCIe version3.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium G3220 1.17
+21.9%
A4-7300 0.96

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium G3220 1881
+22.8%
A4-7300 1532

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Pentium G3220 532
+47.8%
A4-7300 360

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Pentium G3220 893
+60.3%
A4-7300 557

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.17 0.96
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 65 Watt

Pentium G3220 has a 21.9% higher aggregate performance score, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 20.4% lower power consumption.

The Pentium G3220 is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-7300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G3220 and A4-7300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium G3220
Pentium G3220
AMD A4-7300
A4-7300

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 368 votes

Rate Pentium G3220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 98 votes

Rate A4-7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium G3220 or A4-7300, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.