Celeron G3900 vs Pentium G2120

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium G2120
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 55 Watt
1.20
Celeron G3900
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 51 Watt
1.37
+14.2%

Celeron G3900 outperforms Pentium G2120 by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium G2120 and Celeron G3900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23422231
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.070.18
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency2.062.53
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date3 September 2012 (12 years ago)19 October 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$88$42

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron G3900 has 157% better value for money than Pentium G2120.

Detailed specifications

Pentium G2120 and Celeron G3900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.1 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate5 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data28
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size94 mm298.57 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °C65 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium G2120 and Celeron G3900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1155FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt51 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium G2120 and Celeron G3900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++

Security technologies

Pentium G2120 and Celeron G3900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Key-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data-
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium G2120 and Celeron G3900 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium G2120 and Celeron G3900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel HD Graphics 510
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HD-+
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz950 MHz
InTru 3D-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium G2120 and Celeron G3900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Pentium G2120 and Celeron G3900 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAno dataN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Pentium G2120 and Celeron G3900 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium G2120 and Celeron G3900.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium G2120 1.20
Celeron G3900 1.37
+14.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium G2120 1892
Celeron G3900 2164
+14.4%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Pentium G2120 525
Celeron G3900 585
+11.4%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Pentium G2120 927
Celeron G3900 1001
+8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.20 1.37
Recency 3 September 2012 19 October 2015
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 51 Watt

Celeron G3900 has a 14.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 7.8% lower power consumption.

The Celeron G3900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium G2120 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium G2120 and Celeron G3900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium G2120
Pentium G2120
Intel Celeron G3900
Celeron G3900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 93 votes

Rate Pentium G2120 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 223 votes

Rate Celeron G3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium G2120 or Celeron G3900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.