EPYC 9375F vs Pentium E6500

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium E6500
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.73
EPYC 9375F
2024
32 cores / 64 threads, 320 Watt
57.54
+7782%

EPYC 9375F outperforms Pentium E6500 by a whopping 7782% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium E6500 and EPYC 9375F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking273221
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.747.49
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency1.0717.11
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Turin (2024)
Release date9 August 2009 (15 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$50$5,306

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9375F has 912% better value for money than Pentium E6500.

Detailed specifications

Pentium E6500 and EPYC 9375F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads264
Base clock speed2.93 GHz3.85 GHz
Boost clock speed0.93 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (shared)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm4 nm
Die size82 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Number of transistors228 million66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.85V – 1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium E6500 and EPYC 9375F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketLGA775SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium E6500 and EPYC 9375F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Pentium E6500 and EPYC 9375F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium E6500 and EPYC 9375F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium E6500 and EPYC 9375F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium E6500 and EPYC 9375F.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Pentium E6500 0.73
EPYC 9375F 57.54
+7782%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium E6500 1165
EPYC 9375F 92190
+7813%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.73 57.54
Recency 9 August 2009 10 October 2024
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 2 64
Chip lithography 45 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 320 Watt

Pentium E6500 has 392.3% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9375F, on the other hand, has a 7782.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 1025% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9375F is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium E6500 in performance tests.

Note that Pentium E6500 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9375F is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium E6500
Pentium E6500
AMD EPYC 9375F
EPYC 9375F

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 290 votes

Rate Pentium E6500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 9375F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Pentium E6500 and EPYC 9375F, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.