Celeron M 520 vs Pentium E5800

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium E5800
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.74
+393%
Celeron M 520
1 core / 1 thread, 30 Watt
0.15

Pentium E5800 outperforms Celeron M 520 by a whopping 393% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium E5800 and Celeron M 520 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26673304
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.38no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataCeleron M
Power efficiency1.080.47
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date28 November 2010 (13 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$68no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium E5800 and Celeron M 520 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed3.2 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rateno data533 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache2 MB (shared)no data
L3 cache0 KB1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size82 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature74 °C100 °C
Number of transistors228 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625V0.95V-1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Pentium E5800 and Celeron M 520 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketLGA775PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium E5800 and Celeron M 520. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Pentium E5800 and Celeron M 520 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium E5800 and Celeron M 520 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium E5800 and Celeron M 520. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium E5800 and Celeron M 520.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium E5800 0.74
+393%
Celeron M 520 0.15

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium E5800 1172
+390%
Celeron M 520 239

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.74 0.15
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 30 Watt

Pentium E5800 has a 393.3% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M 520, on the other hand, has 116.7% lower power consumption.

The Pentium E5800 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M 520 in performance tests.

Note that Pentium E5800 is a desktop processor while Celeron M 520 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium E5800 and Celeron M 520, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium E5800
Pentium E5800
Intel Celeron M 520
Celeron M 520

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 420 votes

Rate Pentium E5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 50 votes

Rate Celeron M 520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium E5800 or Celeron M 520, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.