i3-2115C vs Pentium Dual T4300

VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium Dual Core T4300 and Core i3-2115C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2643not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Pentium Dual Coreno data
Power efficiency2.10no data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date1 April 2009 (15 years ago)1 May 2012 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium Dual Core T4300 and Core i3-2115C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB3072 KB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size107 mm2131 mm2
Number of transistors410 million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium Dual Core T4300 and Core i3-2115C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketP1155
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium Dual Core T4300 and Core i3-2115C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium Dual Core T4300 and Core i3-2115C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)Intel HD 3000

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium Dual Core T4300 and Core i3-2115C.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 2009 1 May 2012
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Pentium Dual T4300 has 85.7% lower power consumption.

i3-2115C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Pentium Dual Core T4300 and Core i3-2115C. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Pentium Dual Core T4300 is a notebook processor while Core i3-2115C is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium Dual Core T4300 and Core i3-2115C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium Dual Core T4300
Pentium Dual Core T4300
Intel Core i3-2115C
Core i3-2115C

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 161 vote

Rate Pentium Dual Core T4300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 5 votes

Rate Core i3-2115C on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium Dual Core T4300 or Core i3-2115C, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.