Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ vs Pentium Dual T3200

Primary details

Comparing Pentium Dual Core T3200 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Pentium Dual CoreMobile Athlon 64
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Clawhammer (2001−2005)
Release date1 October 2008 (16 years ago)August 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium Dual Core T3200 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed2 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate667 MHz800 MHz
L1 cacheno data128K
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
Chip lithography65 nmno data
Die size143 mm2193 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors291 Million106 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium Dual Core T3200 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno data754
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt81 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium Dual Core T3200 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium Dual T3200 631
+77.2%
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+ 356

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 81 Watt

Pentium Dual T3200 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 131.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Pentium Dual Core T3200 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium Dual Core T3200 and Mobile Athlon 64 3700+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium Dual Core T3200
Pentium Dual Core T3200
AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3700+
Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 82 votes

Rate Pentium Dual Core T3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 3700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium Dual Core T3200 or Mobile Athlon 64 3700+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.