Celeron 1000M vs Pentium Dual T2390

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium Dual Core T2390
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.36
Celeron 1000M
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.67
+86.1%

Celeron 1000M outperforms Pentium Dual Core T2390 by an impressive 86% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium Dual Core T2390 and Celeron 1000M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30542746
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Pentium Dual CoreIntel Celeron
Power efficiency0.971.81
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date1 March 2008 (16 years ago)20 January 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$86

Detailed specifications

Pentium Dual Core T2390 and Celeron 1000M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed1.86 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rate533 MHz5 GT/s
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB256K (per core)
L3 cacheno data2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm22 nm
Die size143 mm2118 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data105 °C
Number of transistors291 Million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium Dual Core T2390 and Celeron 1000M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478G2 (988B)
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium Dual Core T2390 and Celeron 1000M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

Pentium Dual Core T2390 and Celeron 1000M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium Dual Core T2390 and Celeron 1000M are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium Dual Core T2390 and Celeron 1000M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (650 - 1000 MHz)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium Dual T2390 0.36
Celeron 1000M 0.67
+86.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium Dual T2390 568
Celeron 1000M 1069
+88.2%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Pentium Dual T2390 1771
Celeron 1000M 2480
+40%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Pentium Dual T2390 3331
Celeron 1000M 4757
+42.8%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Pentium Dual T2390 1470
Celeron 1000M 1923
+30.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.36 0.67
Recency 1 March 2008 20 January 2013
Chip lithography 65 nm 22 nm

Celeron 1000M has a 86.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 195.5% more advanced lithography process.

The Celeron 1000M is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium Dual Core T2390 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium Dual Core T2390 and Celeron 1000M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium Dual Core T2390
Pentium Dual Core T2390
Intel Celeron 1000M
Celeron 1000M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 60 votes

Rate Pentium Dual Core T2390 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 166 votes

Rate Celeron 1000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium Dual Core T2390 or Celeron 1000M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.