Mobile Sempron 3800+ vs Pentium Dual SU4100

Primary details

Comparing Pentium Dual Core SU4100 and Mobile Sempron 3800+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Pentium Dual CoreMobile Sempron
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Sherman (2009)
Release date1 September 2009 (15 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium Dual Core SU4100 and Mobile Sempron 3800+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz800 MHz
L2 cache2 MBno data
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium Dual Core SU4100 and Mobile Sempron 3800+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA956no data
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium Dual Core SU4100 and Mobile Sempron 3800+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium Dual SU4100 492
+46.9%
Mobile Sempron 3800+ 335

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 31 Watt

Pentium Dual SU4100 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 210% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Pentium Dual Core SU4100 and Mobile Sempron 3800+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium Dual Core SU4100 and Mobile Sempron 3800+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium Dual Core SU4100
Pentium Dual Core SU4100
AMD Mobile Sempron 3800+
Mobile Sempron 3800+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.2 5 votes

Rate Pentium Dual Core SU4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Mobile Sempron 3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium Dual Core SU4100 or Mobile Sempron 3800+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.