Athlon Gold 3150U vs Pentium D 960

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium D 960
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 130 Watt
0.52
Athlon Gold 3150U
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.59
+398%

Athlon Gold 3150U outperforms Pentium D 960 by a whopping 398% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium D 960 and Athlon Gold 3150U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking28391716
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Picasso (Ryzen 3000 APU)
Architecture codenamePresler (2005−2007)Dali (Zen) (2020)
Release date23 April 2006 (18 years ago)6 January 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium D 960 and Athlon Gold 3150U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplierno data24
L1 cache16 KB (per core)192 KB
L2 cache2 MB (per die)1 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Die size2x 81 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)69 °Cno data
Number of transistors376 million4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range1.2V-1.3375Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium D 960 and Athlon Gold 3150U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketLGA775,PLGA775FP5
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium D 960 and Athlon Gold 3150U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Pentium D 960 and Athlon Gold 3150U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium D 960 and Athlon Gold 3150U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium D 960 and Athlon Gold 3150U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium D 960 and Athlon Gold 3150U.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium D 960 0.52
Athlon Gold 3150U 2.59
+398%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium D 960 807
Athlon Gold 3150U 3992
+395%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.52 2.59
Recency 23 April 2006 6 January 2020
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 15 Watt

Athlon Gold 3150U has a 398.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 100% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 766.7% lower power consumption.

The Athlon Gold 3150U is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium D 960 in performance tests.

Note that Pentium D 960 is a desktop processor while Athlon Gold 3150U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium D 960 and Athlon Gold 3150U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium D 960
Pentium D 960
AMD Athlon Gold 3150U
Athlon Gold 3150U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 19 votes

Rate Pentium D 960 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 892 votes

Rate Athlon Gold 3150U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium D 960 or Athlon Gold 3150U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.