EPYC 9355 vs Pentium D 840 EE

VS

Primary details

Comparing Pentium D 840 EE and EPYC 9355 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameSmithfield (2005)Turin (2024)
Release dateMay 2005 (19 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,694

Detailed specifications

Pentium D 840 EE and EPYC 9355 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads464
Base clock speedno data3.55 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cache28 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm4 nm
Die size206 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors169 million66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium D 840 EE and EPYC 9355 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
Socket775SP5
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium D 840 EE and EPYC 9355. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium D 840 EE and EPYC 9355 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium D 840 EE and EPYC 9355. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium D 840 EE and EPYC 9355.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 32
Threads 4 64
Chip lithography 90 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 280 Watt

Pentium D 840 EE has 115.4% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9355, on the other hand, has 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 2150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Pentium D 840 EE and EPYC 9355. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Pentium D 840 EE is a desktop processor while EPYC 9355 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium D 840 EE and EPYC 9355, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium D 840 EE
Pentium D 840 EE
AMD EPYC 9355
EPYC 9355

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Pentium D 840 EE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9355 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium D 840 EE or EPYC 9355, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.