Athlon 64 3100+ vs Pentium D 830

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium D 830
2005
2 cores / 2 threads, 130 Watt
0.36
+20%
Athlon 64 3100+
2008
1 core / 1 thread, 25 Watt
0.30

Pentium D 830 outperforms Athlon 64 3100+ by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium D 830 and Athlon 64 3100+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30413095
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.261.14
Architecture codenameSmithfield (2005)Lima (2008−2009)
Release dateMay 2005 (19 years ago)April 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium D 830 and Athlon 64 3100+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache28 KB128K
L2 cache2 MB512K
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography90 nm65 nm
Die size206 mm277 mm2
Maximum core temperature70 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
Number of transistors169 million122 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.2V-1.4Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Pentium D 830 and Athlon 64 3100+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketPLGA775AM2
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium D 830 and Athlon 64 3100+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE32 Bitno data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Pentium D 830 and Athlon 64 3100+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium D 830 and Athlon 64 3100+ are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium D 830 and Athlon 64 3100+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium D 830 0.36
+20%
Athlon 64 3100+ 0.30

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium D 830 564
+16.5%
Athlon 64 3100+ 484

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.36 0.30
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 90 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 25 Watt

Pentium D 830 has a 20% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Athlon 64 3100+, on the other hand, has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 420% lower power consumption.

The Pentium D 830 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 3100+ in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium D 830 and Athlon 64 3100+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium D 830
Pentium D 830
AMD Athlon 64 3100+
Athlon 64 3100+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 30 votes

Rate Pentium D 830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate Athlon 64 3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium D 830 or Athlon 64 3100+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.