Ryzen 3 7330U vs Pentium A1018

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium A1018
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.79
Ryzen 3 7330U
2023
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
7.17
+808%

Ryzen 3 7330U outperforms Pentium A1018 by a whopping 808% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium A1018 and Ryzen 3 7330U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26381006
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Power efficiency2.0643.59
Architecture codenameno dataBarcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023)
Release date1 July 2013 (11 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Pentium A1018 and Ryzen 3 7330U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speedno data4.3 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cache1 MB Intel® Smart Cache8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data180 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C95 °C
Number of transistorsno data10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Pentium A1018 and Ryzen 3 7330U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCPGA988FP6
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium A1018 and Ryzen 3 7330U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Pentium A1018 and Ryzen 3 7330U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium A1018 and Ryzen 3 7330U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium A1018 and Ryzen 3 7330U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3/L/-RS 1333/1600DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel® ProcessorsAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium A1018 and Ryzen 3 7330U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium A1018 and Ryzen 3 7330U.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium A1018 0.79
Ryzen 3 7330U 7.17
+808%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium A1018 1210
Ryzen 3 7330U 10976
+807%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.79 7.17
Recency 1 July 2013 4 January 2023
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 22 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 3 7330U has a 807.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 214.3% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 7330U is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium A1018 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium A1018 and Ryzen 3 7330U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium A1018
Pentium A1018
AMD Ryzen 3 7330U
Ryzen 3 7330U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 16 votes

Rate Pentium A1018 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 69 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 7330U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium A1018 or Ryzen 3 7330U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.