Ryzen 5 5625U vs Pentium 977

Aggregate performance score

Pentium 977
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 17 Watt
0.72
Ryzen 5 5625U
2022
6 cores / 12 threads, 15 Watt
9.39
+1204%

Ryzen 5 5625U outperforms Pentium 977 by a whopping 1204% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium 977 and Ryzen 5 5625U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2684809
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel PentiumAMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000)
Power efficiency4.0159.24
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022)
Release date1 January 2012 (12 years ago)6 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$134no data

Detailed specifications

Pentium 977 and Ryzen 5 5625U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads212
Base clock speed1.4 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz4.3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier14no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache2 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm7 nm
Die size131 mm2180 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
Number of transistors504 million10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 977 and Ryzen 5 5625U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1023FP6
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 977 and Ryzen 5 5625U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Pentium 977 and Ryzen 5 5625U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 977 and Ryzen 5 5625U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 977 and Ryzen 5 5625U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size16.38 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® ProcessorsAMD Radeon Vega 7
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium 977 and Ryzen 5 5625U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 977 and Ryzen 5 5625U.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium 977 0.72
Ryzen 5 5625U 9.39
+1204%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium 977 1148
Ryzen 5 5625U 14909
+1199%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Pentium 977 1435
Ryzen 5 5625U 11440
+697%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Pentium 977 56
Ryzen 5 5625U 6.46
+767%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Pentium 977 1
Ryzen 5 5625U 16
+1371%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Pentium 977 0.56
Ryzen 5 5625U 2.64
+371%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Pentium 977 0.1
Ryzen 5 5625U 6.2
+5491%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Pentium 977 1059
Ryzen 5 5625U 6341
+499%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.72 9.39
Recency 1 January 2012 6 January 2022
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 2 12
Chip lithography 32 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 5 5625U has a 1204.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 13.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 5625U is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 977 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 977 and Ryzen 5 5625U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 977
Pentium 977
AMD Ryzen 5 5625U
Ryzen 5 5625U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Pentium 977 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1177 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 5625U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium 977 or Ryzen 5 5625U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.