Celeron M 540 vs Pentium 4 2.4 GHz
Aggregate performance score
Celeron M 540 outperforms Pentium 4 2.4 GHz by a whopping 325% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pentium 4 2.4 GHz and Celeron M 540 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3417 | 3093 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | Pentium 4 | Celeron M |
| Power efficiency | 0.13 | 1.08 |
| Architecture codename | Northwood (2002−2004) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| Release date | no data | 1 October 2007 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Pentium 4 2.4 GHz and Celeron M 540 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.86 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | 533 MHz |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 65 nm |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium 4 2.4 GHz and Celeron M 540 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | 59.8 Watt | 30 Watt |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.08 | 0.34 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 59 Watt | 30 Watt |
Celeron M 540 has a 325% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 96.7% lower power consumption.
The Celeron M 540 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 4 2.4 GHz in performance tests.
Note that Pentium 4 2.4 GHz is a desktop processor while Celeron M 540 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 4 2.4 GHz and Celeron M 540, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
