A4-3310MX vs Pentium 3805U
Aggregate performance score
Pentium 3805U outperforms A4-3310MX by a considerable 49% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pentium 3805U and A4-3310MX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2572 | 2793 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Pentium | AMD A-Series |
| Architecture codename | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Llano (2011−2012) |
| Release date | 5 January 2015 (9 years ago) | 14 June 2011 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $161 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Pentium 3805U and A4-3310MX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.9 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 82 mm2 | 226 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1300 Million | 1000 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium 3805U and A4-3310MX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | BGA | FS1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 3805U and A4-3310MX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | 3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480G |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 3805U and A4-3310MX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 3805U and A4-3310MX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell) | AMD Radeon HD 6480G |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 3805U and A4-3310MX.
| PCI Express lanes | 12 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Pentium 3805U outperforms A4-3310MX by 49% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Pentium 3805U outperforms A4-3310MX by 51% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 41%
Pentium 3805U outperforms A4-3310MX by 6% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 41%
Pentium 3805U outperforms A4-3310MX by 14% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
Pentium 3805U outperforms A4-3310MX by 45% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.76 | 0.51 |
| Integrated graphics card | 0.96 | 0.66 |
| Recency | 5 January 2015 | 14 June 2011 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 45 Watt |
Pentium 3805U has a 49% higher aggregate performance score, 45.5% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.
The Pentium 3805U is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-3310MX in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 3805U and A4-3310MX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
