Celeron B820 vs Pentium 3558U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Pentium 3558U
2014
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.65
+30%
Celeron B820
2012
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.50

Pentium 3558U outperforms Celeron B820 by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Pentium 3558U and Celeron B820 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27682891
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel PentiumIntel Celeron
Power efficiency4.101.35
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date1 January 2014 (11 years ago)1 July 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$161$86

Detailed specifications

Pentium 3558U and Celeron B820 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed1.7 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rate5 GT/s4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data17
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache2 MB2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data131 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Pentium 3558U and Celeron B820 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1168FCPGA988,PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Pentium 3558U and Celeron B820. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Pentium 3558U and Celeron B820 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 3558U and Celeron B820 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 3558U and Celeron B820. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics (Haswell) (200 - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1.05 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Pentium 3558U and Celeron B820 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Pentium 3558U and Celeron B820.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pentium 3558U 0.65
+30%
Celeron B820 0.50

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Pentium 3558U 1025
+27.8%
Celeron B820 802

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.65 0.50
Integrated graphics card 0.84 0.77
Recency 1 January 2014 1 July 2012
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 35 Watt

Pentium 3558U has a 30% higher aggregate performance score, 9.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Pentium 3558U is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron B820 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 3558U and Celeron B820, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Pentium 3558U
Pentium 3558U
Intel Celeron B820
Celeron B820

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 107 votes

Rate Pentium 3558U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 143 votes

Rate Celeron B820 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Pentium 3558U or Celeron B820, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.