Athlon 64 X2 6000+ vs Pentium 3558U
Aggregate performance score
Pentium 3558U outperforms Athlon 64 X2 6000+ by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Pentium 3558U and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2768 | 2819 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Pentium | no data |
| Power efficiency | 4.10 | 0.45 |
| Architecture codename | Haswell (2013−2015) | Windsor (2006−2007) |
| Release date | 1 January 2014 (11 years ago) | August 2007 (17 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $161 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Pentium 3558U and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.7 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 5 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512K |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | no data | 220 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 227 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Pentium 3558U and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA1168 | AM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 125 Watt |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Pentium 3558U and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Pentium 3558U and Athlon 64 X2 6000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics (Haswell) (200 - 1000 MHz) | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.65 | 0.59 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 125 Watt |
Pentium 3558U has a 10.2% higher aggregate performance score, a 309.1% more advanced lithography process, and 733.3% lower power consumption.
The Pentium 3558U is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ in performance tests.
Be aware that Pentium 3558U is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Pentium 3558U and Athlon 64 X2 6000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
