Atom x7211RE vs PRO A6-8570E
Aggregate performance score
Atom x7211RE outperforms PRO A6-8570E by an impressive 74% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing PRO A6-8570E and Atom x7211RE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2464 | 2030 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 1.51 | 28.45 |
| Architecture codename | Carrizo (2015−2018) | Amston Lake (2024) |
| Release date | October 2018 (6 years ago) | 8 April 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $42 |
Detailed specifications
PRO A6-8570E and Atom x7211RE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | no data | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 250 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 3,100 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on PRO A6-8570E and Atom x7211RE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | Intel BGA 1264 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A6-8570E and Atom x7211RE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| FRTC | + | - |
| FreeSync | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A6-8570E and Atom x7211RE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A6-8570E and Atom x7211RE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon R5 Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 16EU |
| iGPU core count | 4 | no data |
| Switchable graphics | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of PRO A6-8570E and Atom x7211RE integrated GPUs.
| DisplayPort | n/a | - |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by PRO A6-8570E and Atom x7211RE integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | DirectX® 12 | no data |
| Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A6-8570E and Atom x7211RE.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 9 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.03 | 1.79 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 6 Watt |
Atom x7211RE has a 73.8% higher aggregate performance score, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 983.3% lower power consumption.
The Atom x7211RE is our recommended choice as it beats the PRO A6-8570E in performance tests.
Note that PRO A6-8570E is a desktop processor while Atom x7211RE is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A6-8570E and Atom x7211RE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
