Xeon w5-3525 vs PRO A12-9800

Primary details

Comparing PRO A12-9800 and Xeon w5-3525 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1792not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency3.39no data
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date3 October 2016 (8 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,339

Detailed specifications

PRO A12-9800 and Xeon w5-3525 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed3.8 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data45 MB
Chip lithography28 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size250 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data75 °C
Number of transistors3,100 millionno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on PRO A12-9800 and Xeon w5-3525 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt290 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A12-9800 and Xeon w5-3525. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

PRO A12-9800 and Xeon w5-3525 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A12-9800 and Xeon w5-3525 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A12-9800 and Xeon w5-3525. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channels28
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsN/A
iGPU core count8no data
Enduro+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A12-9800 and Xeon w5-3525 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A12-9800 and Xeon w5-3525 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A12-9800 and Xeon w5-3525.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes8112

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 October 2016 24 August 2024
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 4 32
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 290 Watt

PRO A12-9800 has 346.2% lower power consumption.

Xeon w5-3525, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads.

We couldn't decide between PRO A12-9800 and Xeon w5-3525. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that PRO A12-9800 is a desktop processor while Xeon w5-3525 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A12-9800 and Xeon w5-3525, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD PRO A12-9800
PRO A12-9800
Intel Xeon w5-3525
Xeon w5-3525

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 13 votes

Rate PRO A12-9800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Xeon w5-3525 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about PRO A12-9800 or Xeon w5-3525, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.