Processor N100 vs PRO A12-9800

VS

Aggregate performance score

PRO A12-9800
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.33
Processor N100
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
2.35
+0.9%

Processor N100 outperforms PRO A12-9800 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing PRO A12-9800 and Processor N100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17921788
Place by popularitynot in top-10065
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency3.3937.07
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date3 October 2016 (8 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$128

Detailed specifications

PRO A12-9800 and Processor N100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.8 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.4 GHz
L1 cacheno data96 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB2 MB (shared)
L3 cacheno data6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm10 nm
Die size250 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °C105 °C
Number of transistors3,100 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on PRO A12-9800 and Processor N100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A12-9800 and Processor N100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
PowerTune+-
TrueAudio+-
PowerNow+-
PowerGating+-
Out-of-band client management+-
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Security technologies

PRO A12-9800 and Processor N100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A12-9800 and Processor N100 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
IOMMU 2.0+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A12-9800 and Processor N100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4, DDR5
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) ( - 750 MHz)
iGPU core count8no data
Enduro+-
UVD+-
VCE+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A12-9800 and Processor N100 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A12-9800 and Processor N100 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A12-9800 and Processor N100.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes89

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.33 2.35
Recency 3 October 2016 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 6 Watt

Processor N100 has a 0.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 983.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between PRO A12-9800 and Processor N100.

Note that PRO A12-9800 is a desktop processor while Processor N100 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A12-9800 and Processor N100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD PRO A12-9800
PRO A12-9800
Intel Processor N100
Processor N100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 13 votes

Rate PRO A12-9800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1263 votes

Rate Processor N100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about PRO A12-9800 or Processor N100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.