EPYC 9135 vs PRO A12-8870

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

PRO A12-8870
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.45
EPYC 9135
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 200 Watt
36.56
+1392%

EPYC 9135 outperforms PRO A12-8870 by a whopping 1392% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing PRO A12-8870 and EPYC 9135 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking177096
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data29.27
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency3.5717.30
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Turin (2024)
Release dateOctober 2016 (8 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,214

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

PRO A12-8870 and EPYC 9135 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed3.7 GHz3.65 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm4 nm
Die size250 mm22x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors3,100 million16,630 million
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on PRO A12-8870 and EPYC 9135 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A12-8870 and EPYC 9135. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A12-8870 and EPYC 9135 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A12-8870 and EPYC 9135. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR5
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsN/A
iGPU core count8no data
Enduron/a-
Switchable graphics+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A12-8870 and EPYC 9135 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPortn/a-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A12-8870 and EPYC 9135 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A12-8870 and EPYC 9135.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO A12-8870 2.45
EPYC 9135 36.56
+1392%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

PRO A12-8870 3888
EPYC 9135 58070
+1394%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.45 36.56
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 4 32
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 200 Watt

PRO A12-8870 has 207.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9135, on the other hand, has a 1392.2% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9135 is our recommended choice as it beats the PRO A12-8870 in performance tests.

Note that PRO A12-8870 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9135 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A12-8870 and EPYC 9135, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD PRO A12-8870
PRO A12-8870
AMD EPYC 9135
EPYC 9135

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 216 votes

Rate PRO A12-8870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9135 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about PRO A12-8870 or EPYC 9135, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.