A10-6790B vs PRO A10-8850B
Primary details
Comparing PRO A10-8850B and A10-6790B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1780 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Power efficiency | 2.36 | no data |
Architecture codename | Godaveri (2014−2016) | Richland (2013−2014) |
Release date | 29 September 2015 (9 years ago) | 28 October 2013 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
PRO A10-8850B and A10-6790B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 4 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
L1 cache | no data | 192 KB |
L2 cache | 4096 KB | 4096 KB |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Die size | 245 mm2 | 246 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 72 °C | 74 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | 74 °C |
Number of transistors | 2,411 million | 1,303 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on PRO A10-8850B and A10-6790B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FM2+ | FM2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 100 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A10-8850B and A10-6790B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
FRTC | + | - |
FreeSync | + | - |
PowerTune | + | - |
DualGraphics | + | - |
TrueAudio | + | - |
PowerNow | + | + |
PowerGating | + | + |
Out-of-band client management | + | - |
VirusProtect | + | + |
RAID | + | + |
HSA | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A10-8850B and A10-6790B are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
IOMMU 2.0 | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A10-8850B and A10-6790B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-2133 | DDR3-1866 |
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon R7 Graphics | AMD Radeon HD 8670D |
iGPU core count | 8 | no data |
Number of pipelines | 512 | 384 |
Enduro | + | + |
Switchable graphics | + | + |
UVD | + | + |
VCE | + | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of PRO A10-8850B and A10-6790B integrated GPUs.
DisplayPort | + | + |
HDMI | + | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by PRO A10-8850B and A10-6790B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | DirectX® 12 | DirectX® 11 |
Vulkan | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A10-8850B and A10-6790B.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 2.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 29 September 2015 | 28 October 2013 |
Chip lithography | 28 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 100 Watt |
PRO A10-8850B has an age advantage of 1 year, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 5.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between PRO A10-8850B and A10-6790B. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A10-8850B and A10-6790B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.