i7-870 vs PRO A10-8770

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

PRO A10-8770
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.29
+13.9%
Core i7-870
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
2.01

PRO A10-8770 outperforms Core i7-870 by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing PRO A10-8770 and Core i7-870 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18171928
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.19
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency3.271.97
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Lynnfield (2009−2010)
Release dateOctober 2016 (8 years ago)8 September 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$305

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

PRO A10-8770 and Core i7-870 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.93 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus rateno data2.5 GT/s
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2048 KB256 KB (per core)
L3 cacheno data8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm45 nm
Die size250 mm2296 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data73 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,100 million774 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on PRO A10-8770 and Core i7-870 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4FCLGA1156,LGA1156
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A10-8770 and Core i7-870. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data1.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data36 Bit

Security technologies

PRO A10-8770 and Core i7-870 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A10-8770 and Core i7-870 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A10-8770 and Core i7-870. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 GraphicsN/A
iGPU core count6no data
Switchable graphics+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A10-8770 and Core i7-870 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPortn/a-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A10-8770 and Core i7-870 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A10-8770 and Core i7-870.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO A10-8770 2.29
+13.9%
i7-870 2.01

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

PRO A10-8770 3574
+13.9%
i7-870 3137

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.29 2.01
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 28 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

PRO A10-8770 has a 13.9% higher aggregate performance score, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

i7-870, on the other hand, has 100% more threads.

The PRO A10-8770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-870 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A10-8770 and Core i7-870, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD PRO A10-8770
PRO A10-8770
Intel Core i7-870
Core i7-870

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 115 votes

Rate PRO A10-8770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 1103 votes

Rate Core i7-870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about PRO A10-8770 or Core i7-870, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.