Celeron B860E vs PRO A10-8770

VS

Primary details

Comparing PRO A10-8770 and Celeron B860E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1819not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency3.28no data
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release dateOctober 2016 (8 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

PRO A10-8770 and Celeron B860E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rateno data4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data21
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cache2048 KB512 KB
L3 cacheno data2 MB
Chip lithography28 nm32 nm
Die size250 mm2131 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,100 million504 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on PRO A10-8770 and Celeron B860E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A10-8770 and Celeron B860E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA++
AVX+-
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A10-8770 and Celeron B860E are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A10-8770 and Celeron B860E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400no data
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
iGPU core count6no data
Switchable graphics+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A10-8770 and Celeron B860E integrated GPUs.

DisplayPortn/a-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A10-8770 and Celeron B860E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A10-8770 and Celeron B860E.

PCIe version3.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

PRO A10-8770 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron B860E, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between PRO A10-8770 and Celeron B860E. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that PRO A10-8770 is a desktop processor while Celeron B860E is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A10-8770 and Celeron B860E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD PRO A10-8770
PRO A10-8770
Intel Celeron B860E
Celeron B860E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 115 votes

Rate PRO A10-8770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron B860E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about PRO A10-8770 or Celeron B860E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.