A12-9720P vs PRO A10-8770

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

PRO A10-8770
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.25
+34.7%
A12-9720P
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.67

PRO A10-8770 outperforms A12-9720P by a substantial 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing PRO A10-8770 and A12-9720P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18172055
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency3.2810.54
Architecture codenameCarrizo (2015−2018)Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release dateOctober 2016 (8 years ago)1 June 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

PRO A10-8770 and A12-9720P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.6 GHz
L2 cache2048 KB2 MB
Chip lithography28 nm28 nm
Die size250 mm2250 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,100 million3100 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data-

Compatibility

Information on PRO A10-8770 and A12-9720P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM4FP4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by PRO A10-8770 and A12-9720P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND
AES-NI++
FMA++
AVX++
FRTC+-
FreeSync+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by PRO A10-8770 and A12-9720P are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by PRO A10-8770 and A12-9720P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 GraphicsAMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)
iGPU core count6no data
Switchable graphics+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of PRO A10-8770 and A12-9720P integrated GPUs.

DisplayPortn/a-

Graphics API support

APIs supported by PRO A10-8770 and A12-9720P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by PRO A10-8770 and A12-9720P.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

PRO A10-8770 2.25
+34.7%
A12-9720P 1.67

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

PRO A10-8770 3574
+34.6%
A12-9720P 2656

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.25 1.67
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

PRO A10-8770 has a 34.7% higher aggregate performance score.

A12-9720P, on the other hand, has 333.3% lower power consumption.

The PRO A10-8770 is our recommended choice as it beats the A12-9720P in performance tests.

Note that PRO A10-8770 is a desktop processor while A12-9720P is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between PRO A10-8770 and A12-9720P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD PRO A10-8770
PRO A10-8770
AMD A12-9720P
A12-9720P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 115 votes

Rate PRO A10-8770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 436 votes

Rate A12-9720P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about PRO A10-8770 or A12-9720P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.