Xeon E5335 vs Opteron X2170

VS

Aggregate performance score

Opteron X2170
2016
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
1.20
+22.4%
Xeon E5335
2006
4 cores / 4 threads, 80 Watt
0.98

Opteron X2170 outperforms Xeon E5335 by a significant 22% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Opteron X2170 and Xeon E5335 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23492490
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency4.541.16
Architecture codenameSteppe Eagle (2016)Clovertown (2006−2007)
Release date1 September 2016 (8 years ago)14 November 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Opteron X2170 and Xeon E5335 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (shared)4 MB (per die)
L3 cache0 KB8 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography28 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data2x 143 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data66 °C
Number of transistorsno data582 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage rangeno data1V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Opteron X2170 and Xeon E5335 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFT3LGA771,PLGA771
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron X2170 and Xeon E5335. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data+

Security technologies

Opteron X2170 and Xeon E5335 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron X2170 and Xeon E5335 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron X2170 and Xeon E5335. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardRadeon R5EN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Opteron X2170 1.20
+22.4%
Xeon E5335 0.98

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Opteron X2170 1911
+23.4%
Xeon E5335 1549

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.20 0.98
Recency 1 September 2016 14 November 2006
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 80 Watt

Opteron X2170 has a 22.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 220% lower power consumption.

The Opteron X2170 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5335 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron X2170 and Xeon E5335, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron X2170
Opteron X2170
Intel Xeon E5335
Xeon E5335

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron X2170 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E5335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron X2170 or Xeon E5335, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.