Xeon Platinum 8580 vs Opteron X2 270
Primary details
Comparing Opteron X2 270 and Xeon Platinum 8580 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Architecture codename | Italy (2005−2006) | Emerald Rapids (2023) |
Release date | May 2005 (19 years ago) | 14 December 2023 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Opteron X2 270 and Xeon Platinum 8580 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 60 (Hexaconta-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 120 |
Base clock speed | no data | 2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 4 GHz |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 300 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | Intel 7 nm |
Die size | no data | 2x 763 mm2 |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 81 °C |
Number of transistors | 233 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron X2 270 and Xeon Platinum 8580 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 2 |
Socket | 940 | FCLGA4677 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 350 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron X2 270 and Xeon Platinum 8580. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
vPro | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Speed Shift | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
TSX | - | + |
Status | no data | Launched |
Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Opteron X2 270 and Xeon Platinum 8580 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
EDB | no data | + |
SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron X2 270 and Xeon Platinum 8580 are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron X2 270 and Xeon Platinum 8580. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 @ 5600 MT/s (1 DPC) |
Maximum memory size | no data | 4 TB |
Max memory channels | no data | 8 |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron X2 270 and Xeon Platinum 8580.
PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 80 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 2 | 60 |
Threads | 2 | 120 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 350 Watt |
Opteron X2 270 has 268.4% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8580, on the other hand, has 2900% more physical cores and 5900% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Opteron X2 270 and Xeon Platinum 8580. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron X2 270 and Xeon Platinum 8580, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.