Xeon E5-4607 vs Opteron 848
Primary details
Comparing Opteron 848 and Xeon E5-4607 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1335 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | no data | 4.38 |
| Architecture codename | SledgeHammer (2003−2005) | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) |
| Release date | November 2003 (21 year ago) | 14 May 2012 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Opteron 848 and Xeon E5-4607 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 6.4 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 15 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 193 mm2 | 435 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 106 million | 2,270 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 848 and Xeon E5-4607 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 8 | 4 |
| Socket | 940 | FCLGA2011 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 848 and Xeon E5-4607. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Flex Memory Access | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
Security technologies
Opteron 848 and Xeon E5-4607 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 848 and Xeon E5-4607 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 848 and Xeon E5-4607. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 384 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 34.1 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 848 and Xeon E5-4607.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 40 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 6 |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 89 Watt | 95 Watt |
Opteron 848 has 6.7% lower power consumption.
Xeon E5-4607, on the other hand, has 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 306.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Opteron 848 and Xeon E5-4607. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 848 and Xeon E5-4607, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
