Celeron J1750 vs Opteron 6378
Aggregate performance score
Opteron 6378 outperforms Celeron J1750 by a whopping 982% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Opteron 6378 and Celeron J1750 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1513 | 3102 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.39 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Celeron |
| Power efficiency | 3.05 | 3.24 |
| Architecture codename | Abu Dhabi (2012) | Bay Trail-D (2013) |
| Release date | 5 November 2012 (12 years ago) | 1 September 2013 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $396 | $72 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Opteron 6378 and Celeron J1750 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.41 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 2.41 GHz |
| L1 cache | 768 KB | 112 KB |
| L2 cache | 16 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (per die) | 1 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 2,400 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 6378 and Celeron J1750 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 4 | 1 |
| Socket | G34 | FCBGA1170 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6378 and Celeron J1750. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 36 Bit |
| FDI | no data | - |
| RST | no data | - |
Security technologies
Opteron 6378 and Celeron J1750 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
| Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6378 and Celeron J1750 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6378 and Celeron J1750. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 750 MHz |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Opteron 6378 and Celeron J1750 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 2 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6378 and Celeron J1750.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 4 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.68 | 0.34 |
| Recency | 5 November 2012 | 1 September 2013 |
| Physical cores | 16 | 2 |
| Threads | 16 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 115 Watt | 10 Watt |
Opteron 6378 has a 982.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads.
Celeron J1750, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 1050% lower power consumption.
The Opteron 6378 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1750 in performance tests.
Be aware that Opteron 6378 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron J1750 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 6378 and Celeron J1750, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
