EPYC 9575F vs Opteron 6284 SE

VS

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 6284 SE and EPYC 9575F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameInterlagos (2011−2012)Turin (2024)
Release date1 May 2012 (12 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,791

Detailed specifications

Opteron 6284 SE and EPYC 9575F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads16128
Base clock speed2.7 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz5 GHz
L1 cache768 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache16 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (per die)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size316 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors2,400 million66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 6284 SE and EPYC 9575F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration42
SocketG34SP5
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt400 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6284 SE and EPYC 9575F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6284 SE and EPYC 9575F are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6284 SE and EPYC 9575F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6284 SE and EPYC 9575F.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2012 10 October 2024
Physical cores 16 64
Threads 16 128
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 400 Watt

Opteron 6284 SE has 185.7% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9575F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Opteron 6284 SE and EPYC 9575F. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 6284 SE and EPYC 9575F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 6284 SE
Opteron 6284 SE
AMD EPYC 9575F
EPYC 9575F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Opteron 6284 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9575F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 6284 SE or EPYC 9575F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.