Xeon W-3265M vs Opteron 6278

VS

Aggregate performance score

Opteron 6278
2012
16 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
8.65
Xeon W-3265M
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 205 Watt
21.50
+149%

Xeon W-3265M outperforms Opteron 6278 by a whopping 149% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 6278 and Xeon W-3265M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking882253
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.90
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon W
Power efficiency7.129.93
Architecture codenameInterlagos (2011−2012)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date1 May 2012 (12 years ago)3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,353

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Opteron 6278 and Xeon W-3265M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads1648
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data27
L1 cache768 KB1.5 MB
L2 cache16 MB24 MB
L3 cache8 MB (per die)33 MB
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size316 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data78 °C
Number of transistors2,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 6278 and Xeon W-3265M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration41 (Uniprocessor)
SocketG34FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6278 and Xeon W-3265M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Opteron 6278 and Xeon W-3265M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6278 and Xeon W-3265M are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6278 and Xeon W-3265M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data2 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
Maximum memory bandwidthno data140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6278 and Xeon W-3265M.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Opteron 6278 8.65
Xeon W-3265M 21.50
+149%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Opteron 6278 13733
Xeon W-3265M 34147
+149%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.65 21.50
Recency 1 May 2012 3 June 2019
Physical cores 16 24
Threads 16 48
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 205 Watt

Opteron 6278 has 78.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3265M, on the other hand, has a 148.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon W-3265M is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 6278 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 6278 and Xeon W-3265M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 6278
Opteron 6278
Intel Xeon W-3265M
Xeon W-3265M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 17 votes

Rate Opteron 6278 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 7 votes

Rate Xeon W-3265M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 6278 or Xeon W-3265M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.