Xeon E7-8891 v3 vs Opteron 6278

Aggregate performance score

Opteron 6278
2012
16 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
8.65
Xeon E7-8891 v3
2015
10 cores / 20 threads, 165 Watt
13.61
+57.3%

Xeon E7-8891 v3 outperforms Opteron 6278 by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 6278 and Xeon E7-8891 v3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking871542
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency7.127.81
Architecture codenameInterlagos (2011−2012)Haswell-EX (2015)
Release date1 May 2012 (12 years ago)1 June 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Opteron 6278 and Xeon E7-8891 v3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads1620
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus rateno data9.6 GT/s
L1 cache768 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache16 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (per die)45 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size316 mm2160 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data79 °C
Number of transistors2,400 million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 6278 and Xeon E7-8891 v3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration48
SocketG34FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6278 and Xeon E7-8891 v3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
PAEno data46 Bit

Security technologies

Opteron 6278 and Xeon E7-8891 v3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6278 and Xeon E7-8891 v3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6278 and Xeon E7-8891 v3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-1333/1600/1866, DDR3-1066/1333/1600
Maximum memory sizeno data1.5 TB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data85 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6278 and Xeon E7-8891 v3.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data32

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Opteron 6278 8.65
Xeon E7-8891 v3 13.61
+57.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Opteron 6278 13733
Xeon E7-8891 v3 21615
+57.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.65 13.61
Recency 1 May 2012 1 June 2015
Physical cores 16 10
Threads 16 20
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 165 Watt

Opteron 6278 has 60% more physical cores, and 43.5% lower power consumption.

Xeon E7-8891 v3, on the other hand, has a 57.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 25% more threads, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon E7-8891 v3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 6278 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 6278 and Xeon E7-8891 v3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 6278
Opteron 6278
Intel Xeon E7-8891 v3
Xeon E7-8891 v3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 17 votes

Rate Opteron 6278 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Xeon E7-8891 v3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 6278 or Xeon E7-8891 v3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.