i3-12100F vs Opteron 6278

VS

Aggregate performance score

Opteron 6278
2012
16 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
8.65
Core i3-12100F
2022
4 cores / 8 threads, 58 Watt
8.88
+2.7%

Core i3-12100F outperforms Opteron 6278 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 6278 and Core i3-12100F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking871859
Place by popularitynot in top-1005
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency7.1214.49
Architecture codenameInterlagos (2011−2012)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date1 May 2012 (12 years ago)January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Opteron 6278 and Core i3-12100F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache768 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache16 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (per die)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size316 mm2163 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors2,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 6278 and Core i3-12100F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration41
SocketG34FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt58 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6278 and Core i3-12100F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Opteron 6278 and Core i3-12100F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6278 and Core i3-12100F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6278 and Core i3-12100F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6278 and Core i3-12100F.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Opteron 6278 8.65
i3-12100F 8.88
+2.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Opteron 6278 13733
i3-12100F 14110
+2.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.65 8.88
Physical cores 16 4
Threads 16 8
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 58 Watt

Opteron 6278 has 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

i3-12100F, on the other hand, has a 2.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 98.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Opteron 6278 and Core i3-12100F.

Be aware that Opteron 6278 is a server/workstation processor while Core i3-12100F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 6278 and Core i3-12100F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 6278
Opteron 6278
Intel Core i3-12100F
Core i3-12100F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 17 votes

Rate Opteron 6278 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 8052 votes

Rate Core i3-12100F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 6278 or Core i3-12100F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.