Xeon E7340 vs Opteron 6276

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Opteron 6276
2011
16 cores / 16 threads, 115 Watt
4.00

Xeon E7340 outperforms Opteron 6276 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 6276 and Xeon E7340 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14291401
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.48no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency3.294.87
Architecture codenameInterlagos (2011−2012)no data
Release date14 November 2011 (13 years ago)1 July 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$119no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Opteron 6276 and Xeon E7340 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)no data
Threads16no data
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHzno data
L1 cache768 KBno data
L2 cache16 MBno data
L3 cache8 MB (per die)8 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size316 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data66 °C
Number of transistors2,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.0V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 6276 and Xeon E7340 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration4no data
SocketG34PGA604,PPGA604
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 6276 and Xeon E7340. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
FSB parityno data+

Security technologies

Opteron 6276 and Xeon E7340 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 6276 and Xeon E7340 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 6276 and Xeon E7340. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 6276 and Xeon E7340.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Opteron 6276 4.00
Xeon E7340 4.12
+3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Opteron 6276 6348
Xeon E7340 6544
+3.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.00 4.12
Recency 14 November 2011 1 July 2007
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 80 Watt

Opteron 6276 has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E7340, on the other hand, has a 3% higher aggregate performance score, and 43.8% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Opteron 6276 and Xeon E7340.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 6276 and Xeon E7340, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 6276
Opteron 6276
Intel Xeon E7340
Xeon E7340

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 52 votes

Rate Opteron 6276 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E7340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 6276 or Xeon E7340, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.