AMD Opteron 4376 HE: specs and benchmarks
Aggregate performance score
Opteron 4376 HE provides poor benchmark performance at 2.72% of a leader's which is a 96-core EPYC 9655P.
Summary
AMD started Opteron 4376 HE sales 4 December 2012. This is a Seoul architecture desktop processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 8 cores and 8 threads, and is based on 32 nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 3600 MHz and a locked multiplier.
Compatibility-wise, this is AMD Socket C32 processor with a TDP of 65 Watt. It supports DDR3 memory.
Primary details
Opteron 4376 HE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.
| Place in the ranking | 1708 | |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | |
| Market segment | Server | |
| Power efficiency | 3.96 | of 100.00 (Ryzen Z1 Extreme) |
| Architecture codename | Seoul (2012) | |
| Release date | 4 December 2012 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | |
| Threads | 8 | |
| Base clock speed | 2.6 GHz | of 4.7 GHz (FX-9590) |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | of 6.2 GHz (Core i9-14900KS) |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | of 80 KB (EPYC 9965) |
| L2 cache | 8192 KB | of 2 MB (Xeon 6980P) |
| L3 cache | 8192 KB (shared) | of 1152 MB (EPYC 9684X) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | of 3 nm (Apple M3 Max 16-Core) |
| Die size | 315 mm2 | |
| Number of transistors | 1,200 million | of 135,240 million (EPYC 9684X) |
| 64 bit support | + | |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 4376 HE compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | of 8 (Opteron 842) |
| Socket | C32 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | of 500 Watt (Xeon 6960P) |
Technologies and extensions
Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by Opteron 4376 HE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | |
| FMA | + | |
| AVX | + |
Virtualization technologies
Supported virtual machine optimization technologies. Some are specific to Intel only, some to AMD.
| AMD-V | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by Opteron 4376 HE's memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 |
Benchmark performance
Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of Opteron 4376 HE. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Send your test results of Opteron 4376 HE.
Intel equivalent
According to our data, the closest Intel alternative to Opteron 4376 HE is Xeon L5639, which is faster by 2% and higher by 15 positions in our ranking.
Here are some closest Intel rivals to Opteron 4376 HE:
Similar processors
Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
