Xeon 6972P vs Opteron 252

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 252 and Xeon 6972P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameTroy (2005)Granite Rapids (2024)
Release dateFebruary 2005 (19 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$63no data

Detailed specifications

Opteron 252 and Xeon 6972P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)96
Threads1192
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz3.9 GHz
L1 cache128 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB480 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm5 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data80 °C
Number of transistors106 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 252 and Xeon 6972P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
Socket9407529
Power consumption (TDP)92 Watt500 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 252 and Xeon 6972P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Opteron 252 and Xeon 6972P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 252 and Xeon 6972P are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 252 and Xeon 6972P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 252 and Xeon 6972P.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data96

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 96
Threads 1 192
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 92 Watt 500 Watt

Opteron 252 has 443.5% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6972P, on the other hand, has 9500% more physical cores and 19100% more threads, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Opteron 252 and Xeon 6972P. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 252 and Xeon 6972P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 252
Opteron 252
Intel Xeon 6972P
Xeon 6972P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Opteron 252 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6972P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 252 or Xeon 6972P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.