Ultra 7 256V vs Opteron 248

VS

Aggregate performance score

Opteron 248
2003
1 core / 1 thread, 89 Watt
0.30
Core Ultra 7 256V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 17 Watt
12.16
+3953%

Core Ultra 7 256V outperforms Opteron 248 by a whopping 3953% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Opteron 248 and Core Ultra 7 256V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3101632
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency0.3267.69
Architecture codenameSledgeHammer (2003−2005)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release dateNovember 2003 (21 year ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$12no data

Detailed specifications

Opteron 248 and Core Ultra 7 256V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads18
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rateno data37 MHz
L1 cache128 KB192 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography130 nm3 nm
Die size193 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors106 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Opteron 248 and Core Ultra 7 256V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
Socket940Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 248 and Core Ultra 7 256V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Opteron 248 and Core Ultra 7 256V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 248 and Core Ultra 7 256V are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 248 and Core Ultra 7 256V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 248 and Core Ultra 7 256V.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Opteron 248 0.30
Ultra 7 256V 12.16
+3953%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Opteron 248 476
Ultra 7 256V 19320
+3959%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.30 12.16
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 1 8
Chip lithography 130 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 17 Watt

Ultra 7 256V has a 3953.3% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 4233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 423.5% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 7 256V is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 248 in performance tests.

Be aware that Opteron 248 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 7 256V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 248 and Core Ultra 7 256V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Opteron 248
Opteron 248
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V
Core Ultra 7 256V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron 248 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Core Ultra 7 256V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Opteron 248 or Core Ultra 7 256V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.