Core i5-13600K vs Opteron 144
Primary details
Comparing Opteron 144 and Core i5-13600K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 188 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 6 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 60.91 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | Intel Core i5 |
| Architecture codename | SledgeHammer (2003−2004) | Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont |
| Release date | June 2003 (21 year ago) | 27 September 2022 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $65 | $319 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Opteron 144 and Core i5-13600K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 20 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Bus support | no data | 4 × 16 GT/s |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 768 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 24 MB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | 193 mm2 | 257 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 106 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Opteron 144 and Core i5-13600K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 940 | LGA 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 125 W, 181 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Opteron 144 and Core i5-13600K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Opteron 144 and Core i5-13600K are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Opteron 144 and Core i5-13600K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4, DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 89.604 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | no data | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Opteron 144 and Core i5-13600K.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Core i5-13600K outperforms Opteron 144 by 11935% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 1 | 14 |
| Threads | 1 | 20 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 85 Watt | 125 Watt |
Opteron 144 has 47.1% lower power consumption.
i5-13600K, on the other hand, has 1300% more physical cores and 1900% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Opteron 144 and Core i5-13600K. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Opteron 144 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-13600K is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Opteron 144 and Core i5-13600K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
