EPYC 9455 vs N200

VS

Primary details

Comparing N200 and EPYC 9455 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1613not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiency50.44no data
Architecture codenameno dataTurin (2024)
Release date1 January 2023 (1 year ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$5,412

Detailed specifications

N200 and EPYC 9455 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads496
Base clock speedno data3.15 GHz
Boost clock speedno data4.4 GHz
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data192 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyno data4 nm
Die sizeno data6x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistorsno data49,890 million
64 bit support-+

Compatibility

Information on N200 and EPYC 9455 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
Socketno dataSP5
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt300 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by N200 and EPYC 9455. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by N200 and EPYC 9455 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by N200 and EPYC 9455. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by N200 and EPYC 9455.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2023 10 October 2024
Threads 4 96
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 300 Watt

N200 has 4900% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9455, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 2300% more threads.

We couldn't decide between N200 and EPYC 9455. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that N200 is a notebook processor while EPYC 9455 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between N200 and EPYC 9455, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel N200
N200
AMD EPYC 9455
EPYC 9455

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 39 votes

Rate N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9455 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about N200 or EPYC 9455, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.