i9-14900 vs N200

VS

Aggregate performance score

N200
2023
4 threads, 6 Watt
3.21
Core i9-14900
2024
24 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
30.28
+843%

Core i9-14900 outperforms N200 by a whopping 843% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing N200 and Core i9-14900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1599136
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data47.59
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
Power efficiency50.6344.09
Architecture codenameno dataRaptor Lake-R (2023−2024)
Release date1 January 2023 (1 year ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

N200 and Core i9-14900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz5.6 GHz
Bus rateno data219 MHz
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB Intel® Smart Cache36 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on N200 and Core i9-14900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1264FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)6 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by N200 and Core i9-14900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring++
SIPP-+
GPIO+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

N200 and Core i9-14900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by N200 and Core i9-14900 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by N200 and Core i9-14900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200, DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-4800DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size16 GB192 GB
Max memory channels12
Maximum memory bandwidthno data89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics 770
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequency750 MHz1.65 GHz
Execution Units3232

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of N200 and Core i9-14900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by N200 and Core i9-14900 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096 x 2160@60Hz4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096 x 2160@60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by N200 and Core i9-14900 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.112
OpenGL4.64.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by N200 and Core i9-14900.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes916
USB revision2.0/3.2no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

N200 3.21
i9-14900 30.28
+843%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

N200 5106
i9-14900 48106
+842%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.21 30.28
Integrated graphics card 5.58 6.15
Recency 1 January 2023 8 January 2024
Threads 4 32
Power consumption (TDP) 6 Watt 65 Watt

N200 has 983.3% lower power consumption.

i9-14900, on the other hand, has a 843.3% higher aggregate performance score, 10.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, and 700% more threads.

The Core i9-14900 is our recommended choice as it beats the N200 in performance tests.

Be aware that N200 is a notebook processor while Core i9-14900 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between N200 and Core i9-14900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel N200
N200
Intel Core i9-14900
Core i9-14900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 33 votes

Rate N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 88 votes

Rate Core i9-14900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about N200 or Core i9-14900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.