Mobile Sempron 4000+ vs Mobile Sempron 3300+
Primary details
Comparing Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Mobile Sempron 4000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Mobile Sempron | Mobile Sempron |
| Architecture codename | Roma (2005) | Sherman (2009) |
| Release date | 1 June 2005 (19 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Mobile Sempron 4000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L2 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 65 nm |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Mobile Sempron 4000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | 745 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62/25 Watt | 31 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Mobile Sempron 4000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3 (Roma Core), Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 62 Watt | 31 Watt |
Mobile Sempron 4000+ has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Mobile Sempron 4000+. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Sempron 3300+ and Mobile Sempron 4000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
