EPYC 9555 vs Mobile Sempron 3200+

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Sempron 3200+ and EPYC 9555 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesMobile Sempronno data
Architecture codenameKeeneTurin (2024)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$9,826

Detailed specifications

Mobile Sempron 3200+ and EPYC 9555 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads1128
Base clock speedno data3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data256 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyno data4 nm
Die sizeno data8x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistorsno data66,520 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Sempron 3200+ and EPYC 9555 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
Socketno dataSP5
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Sempron 3200+ and EPYC 9555. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Sempron 3200+ and EPYC 9555 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Sempron 3200+ and EPYC 9555. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Mobile Sempron 3200+ and EPYC 9555.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 64
Threads 1 128
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 360 Watt

Mobile Sempron 3200+ has 1340% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9555, on the other hand, has 6300% more physical cores and 12700% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Mobile Sempron 3200+ and EPYC 9555. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobile Sempron 3200+ is a notebook processor while EPYC 9555 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Sempron 3200+ and EPYC 9555, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Sempron 3200+
Mobile Sempron 3200+
AMD EPYC 9555
EPYC 9555

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Mobile Sempron 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9555 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Sempron 3200+ or EPYC 9555, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.