Ultra 7 265K vs Mobile Sempron 3000+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Mobile Sempron 3000+
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.17
Core Ultra 7 265K
2024
20 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
37.22
+21794%

Core Ultra 7 265K outperforms Mobile Sempron 3000+ by a whopping 21794% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Sempron 3000+ and Core Ultra 7 265K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking327985
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data94.56
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesMobile Sempronno data
Power efficiency0.4628.18
Architecture codenameParisArrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
Release dateno data24 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$394

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Mobile Sempron 3000+ and Core Ultra 7 265K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads120
Base clock speedno data3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz5.5 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data112 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data3 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data30 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyno data3 nm
Die sizeno data243 mm2
Number of transistorsno data17,800 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Sempron 3000+ and Core Ultra 7 265K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno data1851
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Sempron 3000+ and Core Ultra 7 265K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+
SIPP-+

Security technologies

Mobile Sempron 3000+ and Core Ultra 7 265K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Sempron 3000+ and Core Ultra 7 265K are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Sempron 3000+ and Core Ultra 7 265K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5 Depends on motherboard

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc Xe2 Graphics 64EU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Mobile Sempron 3000+ and Core Ultra 7 265K.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Mobile Sempron 3000+ 0.17
Ultra 7 265K 37.22
+21794%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Mobile Sempron 3000+ 269
Ultra 7 265K 59118
+21877%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.17 37.22
Physical cores 1 20
Threads 1 20
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 125 Watt

Mobile Sempron 3000+ has 257.1% lower power consumption.

Ultra 7 265K, on the other hand, has a 21794.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 1900% more physical cores and 1900% more threads.

The Core Ultra 7 265K is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Sempron 3000+ in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobile Sempron 3000+ is a notebook processor while Core Ultra 7 265K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Sempron 3000+ and Core Ultra 7 265K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Sempron 3000+
Mobile Sempron 3000+
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
Core Ultra 7 265K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 4 votes

Rate Mobile Sempron 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 87 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 265K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Sempron 3000+ or Core Ultra 7 265K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.