Solo T1350 vs Mobile Sempron 2800+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Mobile Sempron 2800+
1 core / 1 thread, 62 Watt
0.15
+25%
Core Solo T1350
2006
1 core / 1 thread, 31 Watt
0.12

Mobile Sempron 2800+ outperforms Core Solo T1350 by a significant 25% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Sempron 2800+ and Core Solo T1350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33213359
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesMobile SempronCore Solo
Power efficiency0.230.42
Architecture codenameGeorgetownYonah (2005−2006)
Release dateno dataJanuary 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Mobile Sempron 2800+ and Core Solo T1350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads11
Base clock speedno data1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz1.86 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz533 MHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB
L2 cacheno data2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithographyno data65 nm
Die sizeno data90 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistorsno data151 million
64 bit support--
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.95V-1.262V

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Sempron 2800+ and Core Solo T1350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataPPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)62 Watt31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Sempron 2800+ and Core Solo T1350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Mobile Sempron 2800+ and Core Solo T1350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Sempron 2800+ and Core Solo T1350 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Sempron 2800+ and Core Solo T1350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Mobile Sempron 2800+ 0.15
+25%
Solo T1350 0.12

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Mobile Sempron 2800+ 237
+22.2%
Solo T1350 194

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.15 0.12
Power consumption (TDP) 62 Watt 31 Watt

Mobile Sempron 2800+ has a 25% higher aggregate performance score.

Solo T1350, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.

The Mobile Sempron 2800+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Solo T1350 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Sempron 2800+ and Core Solo T1350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Sempron 2800+
Mobile Sempron 2800+
Intel Core Solo T1350
Core Solo T1350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 7 votes

Rate Mobile Sempron 2800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 6 votes

Rate Core Solo T1350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Sempron 2800+ or Core Solo T1350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.