Celeron 1017U vs Mobile Sempron 210U

VS

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Sempron 210U and Celeron 1017U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated2516
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Mobile SempronIntel Celeron
Power efficiencyno data5.29
Architecture codenameno dataIvy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date16 January 2009 (15 years ago)1 July 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Mobile Sempron 210U and Celeron 1017U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Base clock speedno data1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus rate1600 MHz5 GT/s
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache256 KB512 KB
L3 cacheno data2 MB
Chip lithography65 nm22 nm
Die sizeno data94 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Sempron 210U and Celeron 1017U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socket812-ball BGAFCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Sempron 210U and Celeron 1017U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsAMD64, SSE1-3, MMXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
My WiFino data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Mobile Sempron 210U and Celeron 1017U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Sempron 210U and Celeron 1017U are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Sempron 210U and Celeron 1017U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics for 3rd Generation Intel Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Mobile Sempron 210U and Celeron 1017U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Mobile Sempron 210U and Celeron 1017U.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Mobile Sempron 210U 1190
Celeron 1017U 2201
+85%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 January 2009 1 July 2013
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 17 Watt

Mobile Sempron 210U has 13.3% lower power consumption.

Celeron 1017U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 195.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Mobile Sempron 210U and Celeron 1017U. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Sempron 210U and Celeron 1017U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Sempron 210U
Mobile Sempron 210U
Intel Celeron 1017U
Celeron 1017U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 3 votes

Rate Mobile Sempron 210U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 71 vote

Rate Celeron 1017U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Sempron 210U or Celeron 1017U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.