Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 vs Mobile Sempron 210U

VS

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Sempron 210U and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated3058
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Mobile Sempron2x Athlon 64
Power efficiencyno data1.07
Architecture codenameno dataHawk-256
Release date16 January 2009 (15 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Mobile Sempron 210U and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus rate1600 MHz667 MHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache256 KBno data
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Sempron 210U and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket812-ball BGAno data
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Sempron 210U and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsAMD64, SSE1-3, MMXno data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Sempron 210U and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 31 Watt

Mobile Sempron 210U has 106.7% lower power consumption.

Athlon 64 X2 TK-53, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Mobile Sempron 210U and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Sempron 210U and Athlon 64 X2 TK-53, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Sempron 210U
Mobile Sempron 210U
AMD Athlon 64 X2 TK-53
Athlon 64 X2 TK-53

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 3 votes

Rate Mobile Sempron 210U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 9 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 TK-53 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Sempron 210U or Athlon 64 X2 TK-53, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.