Ryzen Embedded R1606G vs Mobile Pentium 4 520
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen Embedded R1606G outperforms Mobile Pentium 4 520 by a whopping 1633% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Mobile Pentium 4 520 and Ryzen Embedded R1606G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3313 | 1732 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Mobile Pentium 4 | AMD Ryzen Embedded |
| Power efficiency | 0.16 | 9.84 |
| Architecture codename | Northwood (2002−2004) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | no data | 16 April 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Mobile Pentium 4 520 and Ryzen Embedded R1606G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 26 |
| L1 cache | no data | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | no data | 209.8 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4,950 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Mobile Pentium 4 520 and Ryzen Embedded R1606G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | no data | FP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 91 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Pentium 4 520 and Ryzen Embedded R1606G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Pentium 4 520 and Ryzen Embedded R1606G are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Pentium 4 520 and Ryzen Embedded R1606G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-2400 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 32 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 38.397 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1200 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Mobile Pentium 4 520 and Ryzen Embedded R1606G.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.15 | 2.60 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 91 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen Embedded R1606G has a 1633.3% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 506.7% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen Embedded R1606G is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Pentium 4 520 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Pentium 4 520 and Ryzen Embedded R1606G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
