Ryzen 5 5600G vs Mobile Athlon 64 3000+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
2003
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.28
Ryzen 5 5600G
2021
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
12.51
+4368%

Ryzen 5 5600G outperforms Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ by a whopping 4368% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Ryzen 5 5600G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3131624
Place by popularitynot in top-10013
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data29.33
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesMobile Athlon 64AMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency0.7618.20
Architecture codenameOakville (2003−2004)Cezanne (2021−2024)
Release dateAugust 2003 (21 year ago)13 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$259

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Ryzen 5 5600G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads112
Base clock speedno data3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
Multiplierno data39
L1 cache128K64K (per core)
L2 cache512K512K (per core)
L3 cacheno data16 MB
Chip lithographyno data7 nm
Die size193 mm2AM4 (1331) mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors106 million10,700 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Ryzen 5 5600G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754AM4
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Ryzen 5 5600G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Ryzen 5 5600G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Ryzen 5 5600G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 7 ( - 1900 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Ryzen 5 5600G.

PCIe versionno data3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ 0.28
Ryzen 5 5600G 12.51
+4368%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ 450
Ryzen 5 5600G 19872
+4316%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.28 12.51
Physical cores 1 6
Threads 1 12
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ has 85.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 5600G, on the other hand, has a 4367.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads.

The Ryzen 5 5600G is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 5600G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ and Ryzen 5 5600G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
Mobile Athlon 64 3000+
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G
Ryzen 5 5600G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 9225 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 5600G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Athlon 64 3000+ or Ryzen 5 5600G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.