Xeon w9-3595X vs Mobile Athlon 64 2700+

VS

Aggregate performance score

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 35 Watt
0.25
Xeon w9-3595X
2024
60 cores / 120 threads, 385 Watt
62.95
+25080%

Xeon w9-3595X outperforms Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ by a whopping 25080% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ and Xeon w9-3595X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking316613
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data20.42
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesMobile Athlon 64no data
Power efficiency0.6815.46
Architecture codenameClawhammer (2001−2005)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release dateAugust 2005 (19 years ago)24 August 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$5,889

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ and Xeon w9-3595X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)60 (Hexaconta-Core)
Performance-coresno data60
Threads1120
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128K80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K2 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data112.5 MB
Chip lithographyno dataIntel 7 nm
Die size193 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
Number of transistors106 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ and Xeon w9-3595X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket754FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt385 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ and Xeon w9-3595X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ and Xeon w9-3595X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ and Xeon w9-3595X are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ and Xeon w9-3595X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1DDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ and Xeon w9-3595X.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ 0.25
Xeon w9-3595X 62.95
+25080%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ 398
Xeon w9-3595X 99993
+25024%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.25 62.95
Physical cores 1 60
Threads 1 120
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 385 Watt

Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ has 1000% lower power consumption.

Xeon w9-3595X, on the other hand, has a 25080% higher aggregate performance score, and 5900% more physical cores and 11900% more threads.

The Xeon w9-3595X is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ in performance tests.

Be aware that Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ is a notebook processor while Xeon w9-3595X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ and Xeon w9-3595X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
Mobile Athlon 64 2700+
Intel Xeon w9-3595X
Xeon w9-3595X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1 2 votes

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 2700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 41 vote

Rate Xeon w9-3595X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Mobile Athlon 64 2700+ or Xeon w9-3595X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.