Solo U1400 vs Mobile A A110
Primary details
Comparing Mobile A A110 and Core Solo U1400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Mobile A | Core Solo |
| Architecture codename | Stealey (2007) | Yonah (2005−2006) |
| Release date | 4 June 2007 (17 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Mobile A A110 and Core Solo U1400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.8 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 400 MHz | 533 MHz |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | no data |
| L3 cache | no data | 2 MB L2 KB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 65 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 0.85V - 1.1V |
Compatibility
Information on Mobile A A110 and Core Solo U1400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | 663-ball micro-FCBGA | PBGA479 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Mobile A A110 and Core Solo U1400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Mobile A A110 and Core Solo U1400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Mobile A A110 and Core Solo U1400 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | no data | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 3 Watt | 6 Watt |
Mobile A A110 has 100% lower power consumption.
Solo U1400, on the other hand, has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Mobile A A110 and Core Solo U1400. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Mobile A A110 and Core Solo U1400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
